:: SYSINTEC ::
사이트 내 전체검색
검색어 필수
검색
About HNMR
Editorial Board
Submission Guideline
Peer Review
Publication Ethics
Preparing Your Paper
Submitting Your Paper
Queries
Manuscript Submission
Articles
List of issues
Latest
Most read
Most cited
Most downloaded
News & offers
LOGIN
|
Register
HNMR
About HNMR
>
Editorial Board
>
Submission Guideline
>
Peer Review
Publication Ethics
Preparing Your Paper
Submitting Your Paper
Queries
Manuscript Submission
>
Articles
>
List of issues
Latest
Most read
Most cited
Most downloaded
News & offers
>
Articles
Articles 글답변
분류
필수
분류를 선택하세요
Volume 5 2021
Volume 4 2020
Volume 3 2019
Volume 2 2018
Volume 1 2017
이름
필수
비밀번호
필수
이메일
홈페이지
제목
필수
VOL
저자명
키워드
키워드
키워드
키워드
키워드
Most cited
내용
필수
웹에디터 시작
> > > <p align="justify" style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: rgb(99, 99, 99); font-family: "나눔고딕",NanumGothic; font-size: 10pt;"><strong>Although alcohol companies promote “responsible drinking” health campaign messages voluntarily, critics are skeptical of the industry’s campaign, especially given that its messages are too ambiguous to be effective. This study examined how strategically ambiguous messages, in comparison to informative messages, impact college students’ perception of their knowledge as well as the psychological reactance tendency and subsequently influence the formation of attitudes and intent toward responsible drinking practices and alcohol consumption. How alcohol involvement level interacts with the type of message was also examined. An online experiment revealed that strategically ambiguous messages by alcohol companies may serve to solidify their consumer bases by promoting alcohol consumption among college students. When exposed to ambiguous messages, heavier drinkers reported their perceived knowledge level as significantly higher. The false or naïve perception of knowledge induced by ambiguous messages influenced college students’ formation of more positive attitudes toward drinking and consequently engendered greater intent to drink. While informative messages led to more psychological reactance – especially among heavier drinkers – such aroused reactance did not lead to more favorable attitudes toward drinking or intent to drink, meaning there was no boomerang effect of psychological reactance induced by informative messages. The study concludes that the industry’s alcohol responsibility message carries an “adverse effect” from a public health standpoint.</strong></span> </p> > >
웹 에디터 끝
링크 #1
링크 #2
링크 #3
링크 #4
링크 #5
링크 #6
링크 #7
링크 #8
링크 #9
링크 #10
파일 #1
파일 #2
자동등록방지
숫자음성듣기
새로고침
자동등록방지 숫자를 순서대로 입력하세요.
취소